Those who decry administration policies relating to savings and
investment because they benefit mostly the rich ignore an economic
truth that belies this notion.
The calculation of these critics posits that affluence equals
saving, which has it exactly backward. Except for the relative few
who inherit their wealth, the reality is that saving equals
affluence.
The savings habit isn't something a person magically acquires
upon becoming well-off. It is a discipline developed over time. It
is nothing less than deferring gratification by delaying
consumption of a given portion of one's income. Even those at the
lowest income levels can find ways to save if they adhere to the
savings habit.
Certainly it's true that fiscal initiatives reducing the tax
burden on savings' returns favor those with the biggest savings,
who are usually older savers who've had more time to nurture their
nest egg. At the same time, however, these same policies also
encourage younger workers to develop the habit of thrift that will
give them a chance to achieve affluence.
We know this is an economic truth because the current
generation of senior Americans is, generally speaking, the most
affluent elderly cohort in human experience. Much of their
aggregate affluence is the result of a dedication to thrift forged
by the hard times of the '30s.
They either experienced Depression hardship firsthand or its
lesson was drilled into them by their parents. The lesson was that
pursuit of financial security is worth the sacrifices it demands.
Meantime, the succeeding baby boom generation is now approaching
its golden years in what also appears to be an equally affluent
state.
Both cohorts were helped immensely in their quest for financial
security by tax-advantaged savings vehicles created by government
to encourage savings for retirement. The myriad incentives
essentially were either personal retirement plans or
employer-sponsored plans.
Since savings is a learned behavior, often passed down from
parents, many would have built nest eggs without tax-sheltered
savings plans. Nevertheless, it's safe to say government policies
encouraging thrift provided the tipping point for many who needed
an extra nudge toward the savings habit.
As a columnist writing about financial matters, I have had
countless conversations with readers concerning money management
matters. These discussions have convinced me earning power is not
necessarily a valid predictor of saving power. Many of the
thousands with whom I've talked over nearly three decades have
managed to accumulate impressive amounts of wealth while earning
average or even below-average incomes.
There is a common misperception in certain circles that most
average working folk can't be trusted to make good decisions when
managing their financial affairs. This is a generalization that,
in my experience, doesn't hold water.
Given the right encouragement and economic incentives, people
will generally do what's in their best interests. They understand
how money makes money, and any policy that enhances the after-tax
return of their moneymaking will reinforce responsible economic
behavior.
Jerry Heaster's
column appears Wednesdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays.
To reach him, write the business desk at 1729 Grand Blvd.,
Kansas City, MO 64108; call (816) 234-4297; or send
e-mail to jheaster@kcstar.com.
|